In the 1840s it was called Internationalism. In the 1970s it
was called Collective Consciousness. Today we call it Global Community or World Peace. Over the last two centuries, an attractive notion that humans might
be able to put aside cultural and national differences to work in concert
towards unity and the betterment of all, has flitted across the political
imagination and eluded us.
During the last 100 years, political actors across the
spectrum from Right, to Center, to Left, conceptualized that communist nations
would work together to overthrow capitalist ones. Fearful capitalists called it
“The Domino Theory.” Hopeful communists called it the universal brotherhood of
the proletariat. Yet, when communist nations were established in Russia, China
and Vietnam, the results were far less fraternal. Russia and China continued
their perpetual border disputes and opposed each other’s doctrinaire versions
of communism. Vietnam fought both Russian influence and Chinese naval vessels
seizing its fishing boats. Today, Vietnam has a closer diplomatic relationship
with Washington than Beijing.
The difficulty of our coming together, even when it appears
to be in our best interest and under noble umbrellas like “world peace” or “political
solidarity” is puzzling. Perhaps there are elements of our nature that are
beyond social interpretations. Activists and politicians resist the determinism
of biology. A force that cannot be altered through education and progress is
hard for them to accept. Nonetheless, we are a species that rose to the top of
the food chain, continually putting the seed of its most selfish, opportunistic
and ruthless specimens, into the next generation. Cooperation occurred only when
it enhanced individual survival. From before the time that our primate
ancestors drove other primates away from an isolated watering hole or
productive hunting area, we have passed-on the genetic material of selfishness
and tribalism. There is no way that such ingrained biological tendencies could keep from influencing our relationships
with modern groups and tribes.
No comments:
Post a Comment