On September 25, 1988, Pope John Paul II beatified Father Junipero Serra,
the founder and first administrator of California’s mission system in 1769.
Beatification is a major step towards declaring someone a saint. Immediately
there was an outcry of protest, writing and testimony, by many Native Americans
and civil rights activists who recognized that Serra had enslaved, tortured and
killed, thousands of coastal natives, “facilitating the destruction of their
culture” (Castillo, p.201). Elias Castillo was one of the critics who
maintained pressure on the Vatican by presenting a record of Serra’s
inhumanity. A Cross of Thorns, Castillo’s indictment of Serra, was
published in February of 2015. In September of that year Pope Francis (often
hailed as the most socially progressive Pope regarding human rights) canonized
Serra.
Castillo’s book is a straightforward chronology of Serra’s role, along
with that of the Spanish missions, in the conquest, persecution and destruction
of native cultures. Castillo takes a bit too long getting to the incarceration
and forced labor of Native Americans within the missions. He spends fully a
quarter of the book chronicling Spain’s actions towards native people from 1492
to 1769; moves on to describe the history of missionary activity from 1492 to
1769; then provides a history of Native Americans from their migration across
the Bering Straits 14,000 years ago until their contact with the Spanish. This
is much like someone who is protesting against the Keystone Pipeline explaining
first how fossil fuels evolved.
When he does finally arrive in 1769, Castillo provides an immense quantity
of archeological and documentary evidence to describe Serra’s internment
facilities. Incarceration was achieved through a mixture of military force,
false promises of material gain or food, and offers of baptism without
explaining that those who submitted became wards of the Catholic Church.
Children were especially vulnerable. Once parents were baptized, the entire
family was moved into a labor enclave. When children reached the age of ten,
they were separated from their nuclear family, moved into a sex-segregated
dormitory and considered laborers (Castillo, pp. 118-119). Castillo provides
testimony from visitors who describe “how similar the missions were to slave
plantations…everything…brought to our recollection a plantation at Santo
Domingo…the resemblance is so perfect that we have seen both men and women in
irons, and others in stocks. Lastly, the noise of the whip” (Castillo, p. 109).
Beatings were a routine part of life. This punishment was instituted by
“Padre Junipero Serra…who advocated that only by using ‘blows’ and holding them
captives in those compounds could the Indians in the missions be civilized”
(Castillo, Preface page 1). “In his letters, Serra described the Indians’ gods
as ‘demonic’…he wrote that only Catholicism could save the Indians from evil,
believing that punishment was important to rid the demons from their souls. For
this reason, natives were lashed regularly, sometimes so severely that death
followed” (Castillo, p. x).
Severe beatings were not the only reason for native deaths. Castillo
employs the medical research of Randall Milliken and Shelburne Cook, whose
separate studies on health conditions explain high mortality rates. Milliken’s
research showed that “native people were being introduced to diseases that came
from everywhere in the world” due to mission trading with many European nations
and “through the medium of the yearly visits of supply ships from Mexico. These
new diseases thrived not only because the population was immunologically
unprotected, but also because of the crowding and squalor that existed in
mission communities” (Castillo, p. 139). Diet also had an impact on mortality.
A study comparing skeletal remains between mission and pre-Hispanic coastal
natives reveals that “the diet forced on the mission Indians by the friars was
inferior nutritionally when compared to the diet enjoyed by Indians prior to
the establishment of the missions” (Castillo, p. 154). This combination of
factors resulted in the unusual circumstance where “more Indians died than were
born annually” (Castillo, p. 2). According to Cook, “from 1779 to 1833, the
year the missions were effectively dissolved, there were 29,100 births and a
staggering 62,600 deaths…40,000 could be considered natural mortality, leaving
22,600 to be accounted for as due to the negative effect of mission life”
(Castillo, pp. 139-140).
So how did Saint Serra respond to the mounting death toll? “Rather than
express grief over the deaths, Serra rejoiced. And, according to his biographer
and close friend, Friar Francisco Palou, Serra frequently proclaimed ‘Thanks be
to God that by now there is not a mission that does not have sons in
heaven’…even the many deaths of Indian children did not faze Serra’s dark joy.
In a report dated July 24, 1775, to Friar Francisco Pangua, his Franciscan
superior…Serra wrote…‘the spiritual side of the missions is developing
happily…there are simultaneously two harvests, at one time, one for wheat, and
of a plague among the children, who are dying” (Castillo, p. 82).
When looking back at the cruelty of an individual in the past, one is
always in danger of judging them according to modern standards. Were Serra’s
actions considered cruel for his time? Castillo, who is aware of this question,
uses the testimony of over 100 of Serra’s contemporaries who were horrified at
the treatment of Native Americans. Significantly, the author employs the
observations of Serra’s fellow Spanish clergy and government officials who
concur that the system was inhumane, even for its time. But even if those of
Serra’s century had fully accepted the enslavement and violence of his forced
labor facilities, should it be acceptable to us? The Turkish government in 1915
looked upon the Armenian population in their country as fit only for
annihilation. Does that make the genocide of 1.5 million Armenians acceptable?
Regardless of the judgment of history or the present, the Catholic Church
should have its own standards. With the canonization of Serra, it is their
hypocrisy that is truly in question. They allegedly base their decisions and
actions on Canon Law and the biblical myths of a non-violent savior who lived
in poverty and sacrificed his life out of compassion for humanity. There are
individuals, like Serra, whose devotion to the institution caused them to act
in violent, inhumane ways, but are ignored rather than honored. No pope has
seen fit to canonize Tomas de Torquemada, Spain’s first Grand Inquisitor, a
famous administrator of torture and death by burning. But a friar who enslaved
as many Native Americans as he could, causing the deaths of thousands and abetting
the annihilation of surrounding tribes, is accorded sainthood. Why? Because the
Catholic Church exists, as a profitable institution, to expand its wealth and
influence. Canonizing Serra is a way to claim California as an area where they
have power. Sainthood gives the faithful an idol around whom to gather and
pray. Canonization is highly political and propagandistic in its enactment. In
the most craven, calculating manner, the Church weighed the value of increased
power/influence, against the lives of the thousands of Native Americans Serra
killed. They decided that the institution would benefit more from having Serra
as a saint. The outcry for justice from Native Americans, the inhumanity of
Serra, even the Church’s allegedly vaunted morality; none of these were factors
in their decision. The Vatican may wish to ignore the acts of Junipero Serra.
But Castillo will not. After all of his work, he deserves the last word:
“Serra and his Franciscans established, in the Century of Light, a
movement that had a goal of crushing the civilization of California’s coastal
Indians. Imprisoned within the missions, where they died by the tens of
thousands, the Indians saw their lands lost and their culture all but
extinguished” (Castillo, p. 202).
Castillo, Elias. A Cross of Thorns. The Enslavement of California’s
Indians by the Spanish Missions. Fresno: Craven Street Books, 2015.
No comments:
Post a Comment