On Thursday, December 4, 1969, the Chicago Police broke into
the apartment of Black Panther Chairman, Fred Hampton, and murdered him.
Attorney Jeffrey Haas was part of a legal team that won damages for the
families of Hampton and other Panthers killed and wounded in the raid. Damages
were paid by the Chicago Police, by the FBI (whose informant supplied a floor
plan of the apartment showing where Hampton slept and was killed) and by Cook
County (whose State’s Attorney [Edward V. Hanrahan] ordered the raid). This
book is Haas’s version of the chronology which exposed the criminal collusion
of those three government bodies.
Haas is aware throughout, that this book will be read by
people who have little sympathy for the revolutionary rhetoric of the Panthers.
He honestly presents Fred Hampton’s support of violent tactics: When Hampton is
asked “Do you feel that a legitimate means of obtaining what you are after is
armed violence or armed revolution,” Hampton responds “I believe if we tried
anything else we would end up like Dr. Martin Luther King” (Haas, p. 51).
In order to make his case to a readership where some are
likely to be skeptical of his clients and conclusions, Haas relies on evidence
from the FBI and government sources. When he wants to present FBI collusion
with police in the murder, he employs the transcript testimony of FBI agent Roy
Mitchell, who admitted under oath that he obtained the floor plan of Hampton’s
apartment from his planted informant inside the Panther organization, then
passed it on to the Chicago Police (Haas, pp. 195-7). When Haas wishes to show
that the police murdered Fred Hampton while he lay face-down and helpless in
his bed, he uses the evidence from FBI ballistics specialist Robert Zimmers,
and pathology reports of the Federal Grand Jury, which reveal the downward
trajectory of the bullets into Hampton’s prone body (Haas, p. 124). When Haas
wants to demonstrate that the FBI wanted Hampton dead, he uses the FBI’s anonymously
written letter from its own files, to a Chicago street gang leader, attempting
to convince him to kill Hampton (Haas, p. 224). All these pieces of evidence
were obtained from the FBI via legal discovery, documented in the public record
and presented in the trials against the FBI, the Chicago Police & Edward V.
Hanrahan.
Haas was a young lawyer in 1969. His demeanor was frequently
self-righteous and unprofessional. Haas put in writing to the appellate court
that “FBI racial counterintelligence was a star-spangled blueprint for
genocide” (Haas, p. 361). Such strident language, used often by Haas, is common
in street protest, but does not constitute evidentiary language in a legal
argument. Experienced NAACP civil rights lawyer James Montgomery, (Haas’s
one-time co-counsel), told Hampton’s parents that “he no longer wanted to work
with [Haas] and that [his] tactics only led to infuriating the judge” (Haas, p.
312). When Haas and his co-counsel defend in court their labeling of
opposing attorneys ideas as “’fascist’ mentality,” Judge Fairchild admonishes
them to “focus on the facts…not the abstract labels (Haas, p. 322). All of this
is described in the book without any self-criticism or self-awareness on the
part of the author.
Despite Haas’s prior lack of polish and current inability to
self-reflect, his book accomplishes what it set-out to do: Using legal facts
supplied by FBI and government records, it exposes FBI , Chicago Police and State's Attorney General, collusion in the murder of a political figure.
Haas, Jeffrey. The Assassination of Fred Hampton. How
the FBI and the Chicago Police Murdered a Black Panther. Chicago: Lawrence
Hill Books, 2010.
No comments:
Post a Comment