Most people outside of French institutions of higher
learning know nothing about Louis Blanc. But during the 1848 Revolution, there
was no more popular Frenchman in Paris. His books had educated a generation of
rebels on the Republican-Socialist alternative to monarchy. As a result,
organizers of that monarchy’s opposition and workers in the streets saw him as
their leader. The politicized populace was fully willing to place him as leader
without parliamentary due process. Indeed, on more than one occasion during
those tumultuous days, they carried him on their shoulders (as he struggled to
get down), with the intention of violently installing him as autocrat of the
government. There was certainly precedent for this means of choosing
leadership. Only 50 years earlier, Robespierre had attained supremacy using the
power of the mob. But Blanc was not a demagogue. He resisted violent efforts to
attain his goals. He thought that the combination of education and
representational government would lead to the realization of democratic and
socialist ideas he propounded in his writing.
Leo Loubere follows Blanc’s career from journalism and
history-writing, through his involvement in the 1848 Revolution, to his later
career and death. Permeating the entire chronology are the revolutionary’s
ideas on state, republicanism, socialism and social conditions. Be prepared for
some detailed political philosophy; this is not just a portrait of a life. It
is also quite critical of Blanc’s thoughts and actions. Saliently, his thoughts
on violence are self-contradicting. While Blanc clearly states that “a
cause…which must dip its hands in blood…can only retard the forward thrust of
progress” (Loubere, p. 48), he supports war against Britain, rationalizing that
for economic reasons “either France
must perish, or England be erased from the map” (Loubere, p. 52). Politically
progressive readers may be disappointed that Blanc repudiates the Paris Commune
for its establishment through violent rebellion; but when the troops kill 20,000
communards, Blanc is silent (Loubere, p. 197).
Loubere has inimical tendency to perseverate upon sectarian
political divisions within 19th Century France. This grinding
proclivity dominates chapters 17 and 18, which lead-up to a final whimper on
Blanc’s death and legacy. The only consolation to this weak ending is that
these chapters comprise 32 short pages, so are quickly dispatched (or skimmed
based upon the reader’s preference).
By the author’s admission, “Blanc was not a particularly
effective leader” (Loubere, p. 162). He possessed neither the personal opportunism
nor the strategic skill to create a lasting legacy. His gifts were those of a
teacher, propagandist and thinker. As the biographies of Socrates and Marx
show, such people are not remembered unless there is an intrepid student or
following to carry-forth their projects. So outside of French academia, Louis
Blanc is a forgotten footnote in history.
Loubere, Leo A. Louis Blanc. His Life and His
Contribution to the Rise of French Jacobin-Socialism. Westport: Greenwood
Press, Publishers, 1980.
No comments:
Post a Comment