Until the Rulers Obey is a selection of interviews
with South American social activists from organizations that are not affiliated
with any government or party. Occasionally, their concerns and resulting
popularity have resulted in their becoming an opposition party, but that is a
rare occurrence. This is an extensive project involving 400 pages of interviews
with individuals and groups of courageous activists. Their differing issues
cover a broad range which includes indigenous rights, women’s rights,
environmentalism, LGBTQIA rights, and poor people’s movements. Almost all of
the interviewees have faced violence from governments, paramilitaries, or thugs
hired by multinational corporations. Without these interviews, their concerns,
persistence and contribution would have remained unknown outside of their own
nations. Some remain anonymous so that their activities cannot be tracked by
the state. The interviewers themselves faced significant danger in their efforts
to gather some of these stories.
Each chapter represents a different South American country.
After a brief overview of the social issues facing the populace of that nation,
a series of interviews with activists working on those issues follows. Their
approaches are creative, and as wide ranging as their topics: opposition
newspapers, underground abortion services, protest, sabotage of mining
equipment, occupations of land, public anti-homophobia education, creation of
worker cooperatives; these are just a few of their differing responses to
oppression.
Though their issues and approaches differ, there are some
commonalities among them. Aside from the aforementioned autonomy from
government, these groups are, almost uniformly, opposed to multinational
corporate interference in their national economies. This opposition was
expressed by interviewees whose issues were not necessarily economic. LGBTQIA
and feminist organizers also expressed that international capitalism was
harming their nation. The authors employ the term “neoliberalism,” a
re-emergence of 19th century classical liberalism which embraced
free market capitalism and, in its South American iteration, included a
component of colonialism. It is understandable that activists with compassion
for the local people would oppose multinationals regardless of their area of
work, given the pervasive damage caused by these companies. These giants, with
the assistance of local oligarchs, have displaced indigenous populations from
their homes, extracted minerals or agribusiness products and polluted the
environment.
But be aware that the selection of anti-corporate interview
subjects was a conscious choice on the part of the editors. They avoided
interviewing organizations and individuals who lacked such a critique, and even
subtlely derided activists who did not include anti-multinational ideas in
their program. For example, Adrienne Pine, who wrote and performed most of the
interviews for the Honduras chapter, stated “groups dealing with gender and
sexuality issues organized primarily around a nonprofit model in the 2000s, and
often found themselves limited by the priorities of their funders. Much
feminist work focused on documentation of and service to women victims of
domestic violence, ‘empowerment,’ sexuality trainings, and other narrowly
defined women’s issues: LGBTQ organizations found themselves working
primarily on antihomophobia and HIV/AIDS
prevention educational outreach work. (Ross & Rein, pp. 62-3). Pine’s
statement is condescending towards South American activists, indicating that
these people were not sincerely interested in correcting social problems like
domestic violence and homophobia; but were “limited by the priorities of their
funders.” One is lead to presume that, if not for their funders, these individuals
would have been working on economic, anti-capitalist issues. The author gives
no credit to the organizers themselves for having independent wills and perhaps
choosing to fight domestic violence or homophobia because they or their
populations were harmed by these problems. Pine’s statement also demeans the
importance of LGBTQIA and women’s issues. Though the author may think of these
concerns as “narrow,” or imported from above by white western funders, many
women and LGBTQIA people feel that their rights and survival depend on solving
these problems.
There is nothing wrong with having a book that primarily
examines economic issues and takes a stand against the damage done by
multinationals. In addition, the editors are to be complimented on their
open-minded inclusion of women’s and LGBTQIA concerns. However, intersecting
with other movements requires respect for, and sensitivity towards, their
issues. At times, it appears as if some human rights concerns are drawn into
the narrative as a way to entice readers for whom those issues are a priority.
In another situation, editor Clifton Ross interviews Paraguayan feminist Liz
Becker. Becker opens with a two page criticism of government and neoliberalism
before even beginning to discuss women’s rights. She then gives women’s issues
slightly less than a page of analysis (Ross & Rein, pp. 351-4). Again, this
is a book intended to combat international capitalist abuses. But there is a
strong flavor to this discussion reminiscent of a doctrinaire 1970s Russian
Communist Party technique: they would send-out female comrades to women’s
organizations, allegedly to discuss feminism, but with talking points about how
capitalism enslaves women, whereas the Party’s program would make women free.
It is propagandistic, co-optive and disrespectful.
The pictures of these mostly tiny, non-violent, autonomous
organizations, (struggling against worldwide capitalist money, wealthy
oligarchs, colluding governments; who employ violent paramilitaries and armies),
is compelling. Occasionally, we see victories: The retaking of land by
indigenous communities, the defeat of a mining or hydroelectric project, an
autonomous movement fielding an independent parliamentary candidate who wins.
But, if there is an eventual victory against this array of powers, it’s a long
way off and a long shot. This overview of South American anti-multinational
struggles is a window on a set of movements rarely seen outside of their
localities. It broadens our world, opens our eyes, and provides perspectives
from individuals working in small, sometimes anonymous ways, to carve-out a
little justice.
Ross, Clifton & Rein, Marcy (eds.). Until the Rulers
Obey: Voices from Latin American Social Movements. Oakland: PM Press, 2014.